Appendix: Examples of international principles

Australia’s AI Ethics Principles[1]

• Human, societal and environmental wellbeing

• Human-centred values: respect human rights, diversity, autonomy

• Fairness: inclusive and accessible, avoid discrimination

• Privacy, protection and security

• Reliability and safety

• Transparency and explainability and responsible disclosure

• Contestability: process to challenge outcomes

• Accountability and human oversight

Ethics guidelines, European Commission[2] (referred to by EU AI Act[3])

• Human agency and oversight

• Technical robustness and safety

• Privacy and data governance

• Transparency

• Diversity, non-discrimination and fairness

• Societal and environmental well-being

• Accountability

OECD Principles on AI development[4]

• Inclusive growth, sustainable development and well-being

• Respect for rule of law, human rights and democratic values, including fairness and privacy

• Transparency and explainability

• Robustness, security and safety

• Accountability

The principles have informed other guidance e.g. Scotland’s AI Strategy.[5] Over 47 countries are adherents to the OECDS’s principles on AI.[6]

Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law[7]

• Human dignity and individual autonomy

• Transparency and oversight

• Accountability and responsibility

• Equality and non-discrimination

• Privacy and personal data protection

• Reliability

• Safe innovation, fostering innovation while avoiding adverse impacts on human rights, democracy and the rule of law.

UNESCO – recommendation on the ethics of AI[8]

• Proportionality and do no harm

• Safety and security

• Fairness and non-discrimination

• Sustainability

• Right to privacy and data protection

• Human oversight and determination

• Transparency and explainability

• Responsibility and accountability

• Awareness and literacy

• Multi-stakeholder and adaptive governance and collaboration

UK AI Framework[9]

• Safety, security and robustness

• Appropriate transparency and explainability

• Fairness

• Accountability and governance

• Contestability and redress

Cananda’s Artificial Intelligence and Data Bill[10]

• Human oversight and monitoring

• Transparency

• Fairness and equity

• Safety

• Accountability

• Validity and robustness

United States Executive Order: New Standards for AI Safety and Security[11]

• Safe and secure

• Responsible innovation, competition and collaboration

• Responsible development and commitment to support American workers

• AI policies must be consistent with advancing equity and civil rights

• Protection of user interests, including consumer protection, and safeguards against fraud, bias, discrimination, privacy

• Protection of privacy and civil liberties including secure data collection and storage

• Build government capacity to regulate, govern and support AI use

• Government should be a leader to technological progress

Trustworthy AI in Aotearoa – AI Principles[12]

• Fairness and justice

• Reliability, security and privacy

• Transparency

• Human oversight and accountability

• Wellbeing

Brazil’s National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence (EBIA)[13]

• Inclusive growth

• Sustainable development and well-being

• Human-centred values and fairness

• Transparency and explainability

• Robustness, security and safety

• Accountability.

In May 2023, the Brazilian Government introduced a Bill for a proposed regulatory approach to AI, containing the following principles:[14]

• Reliability and robustness; transparency

• Explainability, intelligibility and auditability

• Accountability, responsibility and full reparation for damage; non-maleficence (to do no harm)

• Human participation

• Non-discrimination, justice, equity and inclusion

• Inclusive growth and sustainable development

• Due process of law and contestability

• Prevention, precaution and mitigation of systemic risks.

Japan’s Social Principles of Human-Centric AI[15]

• Human-centric

• Education/literacy

• Privacy protection

• Ensuring security

• Fair competition

• Fairness, accountability, and transparency

• Innovation

These are underpinned by three core societal values:

• Dignity

• Diversity and inclusion

• Sustainability

South Korea Human Rights Guidelines on Development and Utilisation of AI[16]

Basic principles:

• Respect for human dignity

• Common good of society

• Proper use of technology

Key requirements:

• Safeguarding human rights

• Protection of privacy

• Respect for diversity

• Public good

• Solidarity

• Data management

• Accountability

• Safety

• Transparency

Singapore – AI Verify’s AI Governance and Testing Framework and Tool Kit.[17]

• Transparency

• Explainability

• Repeatability/Reproducibility

• Safety

• Security

• Robustness

• Fairness

• Data governance

• Accountability

• Human agency and oversight

• Inclusive growth, societal and environmental well-being

South Africa National AI Policy Framework[18]

Strategic pillars

• Talent development /Capacity development

• Digital infrastructure

• Research, development and innovation

• Public sector implementation

• Ethical AI guideline development

• Privacy and data protection

• Safety and security

• Transparency and explainability

• Fairness and mitigating bias


  1. Australian Government, ‘Australia’s AI Ethics Principles – Australia’s Artificial Intelligence Ethics Framework’, Department of Industry, Science and Resources (Web Page, 5 October 2022) <https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-artificial-intelligence-ethics-framework/australias-ai-ethics-principles>.

    ↑

  2. High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (AI HLEG), Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI: Shaping Europe’s Digital Future (Guidelines, European Commission, 8 April 2019) 14 <https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai>.

    ↑

  3. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act) [2024] OJ L 2024/1689, Recital (27).

    ↑

  4. OECD, Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence (Report No OECD/LEGAL/0449, 2024).

    ↑

  5. Digital Scotland, Scotland’s Artificial Intelligence Strategy: Trustworthy, Ethical and Inclusive (Report, March 2021) <https://www.gov.scot/binaries/content/documents/govscot/publications/strategy-plan/2021/03/scotlands-ai-strategy-trustworthy-ethical-inclusive/documents/scotlands-artificial-intelligence-strategy-trustworthy-ethical-inclusive/scotlands-artificial-intelligence-strategy-trustworthy-ethical-inclusive/govscot%3Adocument/scotlands-artificial-intelligence-strategy-trustworthy-ethical-inclusive.pdf>.

    ↑

  6. ‘OECD Updates AI Principles to Stay Abreast of Rapid Technological Developments’, OECD (Web Page, 3 May 2024)

    <https://www.oecd.org/en/about/news/press-releases/2024/05/oecd-updates-ai-principles-to-stay-abreast-of-rapid-technological-developments.html>.

    ↑

  7. Council of Europe, Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law, opened for signature 5 September 2024, CETS 225 – Artificial Intelligence, <https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence/the-framework-convention-on-artificial-intelligence>

    ↑

  8. UNESCO, Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (No SHS/BIO/PI/2021/1, 2022) <https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137>.

    ↑

  9. Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (UK), A Pro-Innovation Approach to AI Regulation (Report No CP 815, March 2023).

    ↑

  10. Government of Canada, The Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA) – Companion Document (Web Page, 13 March 2023) <https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/innovation-better-canada/en/artificial-intelligence-and-data-act-aida-companion-document>.

    ↑

  11. President of the United States of America, Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence (Executive Order No 14110, 30 October 2023).

    ↑

  12. AI Forum New Zealand, Trustworthy AI in Aotearoa: AI Principles (Report, March 2020) <https://aiforum.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Trustworthy-AI-in-Aotearoa-March-2020.pdf>.

    ↑

  13. Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovations (MCTI), ‘Brazilian AI Strategy’, OECD.AI Policy Observatory (Web Page, 7 September 2022) <https://oecd.ai/en/dashboards/policy-initiatives/http:%2F%2Faipo.oecd.org%2F2021-data-policyInitiatives-27104>.

    ↑

  14. Bruno Bioni, Marina Garrote and Paula Guedes, Key Themes in AI Regulation: The Local, Regional and Global in the Pursuit of Regulatory Interoperability (Report, Data Privacy Brazil Research Association, 2023).

    ↑

  15. Cabinet Secretariat of Japan, Social Principles of Human-Centric AI (Report, Government of Japan, 2019) <https://www.cas.go.jp/jp/seisaku/jinkouchinou/pdf/humancentricai.pdf>.

    ↑

  16. Korea Information Society Development Institute, ‘The National Guidelines for AI Ethics’, AI Ethics Communications Channel (Web Page, 2021) <https://ai.kisdi.re.kr/eng/main/contents.do?menuNo=500011>.

    ↑

  17. Verify Foundation and Infocomm Media Development Authority, Model AI Governance Framework for Generative AI (Report, 30 May 2024) <https://aiverifyfoundation.sg/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Model-AI-Governance-Framework-for-Generative-AI-May-2024-1-1.pdf> Note AI Verify is a not-for profit foundation, which sits under the Infocomm Media Development Authority of Singapore. .

    ↑

  18. Department of Communications and Digital Technologies, South Africa National Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy Framework 2024 (Report, August 2024) <https://www.policyvault.africa/policy/south-africa-national-artificial-intelligence-ai-policy-framework-2024/>.

    ↑