Artificial Intelligence in Victoria’s Courts and Tribunals: Consultation Paper
Appendix: Examples of international principles
Australia’s AI Ethics Principles[1] |
• Human, societal and environmental wellbeing • Human-centred values: respect human rights, diversity, autonomy • Fairness: inclusive and accessible, avoid discrimination • Privacy, protection and security • Reliability and safety • Transparency and explainability and responsible disclosure • Contestability: process to challenge outcomes • Accountability and human oversight |
Ethics guidelines, European Commission[2] (referred to by EU AI Act[3]) |
• Human agency and oversight • Technical robustness and safety • Privacy and data governance • Transparency • Diversity, non-discrimination and fairness • Societal and environmental well-being • Accountability |
OECD Principles on AI development[4] |
• Inclusive growth, sustainable development and well-being • Respect for rule of law, human rights and democratic values, including fairness and privacy • Transparency and explainability • Robustness, security and safety • Accountability The principles have informed other guidance e.g. Scotland’s AI Strategy.[5] Over 47 countries are adherents to the OECDS’s principles on AI.[6] |
Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law[7] |
• Human dignity and individual autonomy • Transparency and oversight • Accountability and responsibility • Equality and non-discrimination • Privacy and personal data protection • Reliability • Safe innovation, fostering innovation while avoiding adverse impacts on human rights, democracy and the rule of law. |
UNESCO – recommendation on the ethics of AI[8] |
• Proportionality and do no harm • Safety and security • Fairness and non-discrimination • Sustainability • Right to privacy and data protection • Human oversight and determination • Transparency and explainability • Responsibility and accountability • Awareness and literacy • Multi-stakeholder and adaptive governance and collaboration |
UK AI Framework[9] |
• Safety, security and robustness • Appropriate transparency and explainability • Fairness • Accountability and governance • Contestability and redress |
Cananda’s Artificial Intelligence and Data Bill[10] |
• Human oversight and monitoring • Transparency • Fairness and equity • Safety • Accountability • Validity and robustness |
United States Executive Order: New Standards for AI Safety and Security[11] |
• Safe and secure • Responsible innovation, competition and collaboration • Responsible development and commitment to support American workers • AI policies must be consistent with advancing equity and civil rights • Protection of user interests, including consumer protection, and safeguards against fraud, bias, discrimination, privacy • Protection of privacy and civil liberties including secure data collection and storage • Build government capacity to regulate, govern and support AI use • Government should be a leader to technological progress |
Trustworthy AI in Aotearoa – AI Principles[12] |
• Fairness and justice • Reliability, security and privacy • Transparency • Human oversight and accountability • Wellbeing |
Brazil’s National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence (EBIA)[13] |
• Inclusive growth • Sustainable development and well-being • Human-centred values and fairness • Transparency and explainability • Robustness, security and safety • Accountability. In May 2023, the Brazilian Government introduced a Bill for a proposed regulatory approach to AI, containing the following principles:[14] • Reliability and robustness; transparency • Explainability, intelligibility and auditability • Accountability, responsibility and full reparation for damage; non-maleficence (to do no harm) • Human participation • Non-discrimination, justice, equity and inclusion • Inclusive growth and sustainable development • Due process of law and contestability • Prevention, precaution and mitigation of systemic risks. |
Japan’s Social Principles of Human-Centric AI[15] |
• Human-centric • Education/literacy • Privacy protection • Ensuring security • Fair competition • Fairness, accountability, and transparency • Innovation These are underpinned by three core societal values: • Dignity • Diversity and inclusion • Sustainability |
South Korea Human Rights Guidelines on Development and Utilisation of AI[16] |
Basic principles: • Respect for human dignity • Common good of society • Proper use of technology Key requirements: • Safeguarding human rights • Protection of privacy • Respect for diversity • Public good • Solidarity • Data management • Accountability • Safety • Transparency |
Singapore – AI Verify’s AI Governance and Testing Framework and Tool Kit.[17] |
• Transparency • Explainability • Repeatability/Reproducibility • Safety • Security • Robustness • Fairness • Data governance • Accountability • Human agency and oversight • Inclusive growth, societal and environmental well-being |
South Africa National AI Policy Framework[18] |
Strategic pillars • Talent development /Capacity development • Digital infrastructure • Research, development and innovation • Public sector implementation • Ethical AI guideline development • Privacy and data protection • Safety and security • Transparency and explainability • Fairness and mitigating bias |
-
Australian Government, ‘Australia’s AI Ethics Principles – Australia’s Artificial Intelligence Ethics Framework’, Department of Industry, Science and Resources (Web Page, 5 October 2022) <https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-artificial-intelligence-ethics-framework/australias-ai-ethics-principles>.
-
High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (AI HLEG), Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI: Shaping Europe’s Digital Future (Guidelines, European Commission, 8 April 2019) 14 <https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai>.
-
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act) [2024] OJ L 2024/1689, Recital (27).
-
OECD, Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence (Report No OECD/LEGAL/0449, 2024).
-
Digital Scotland, Scotland’s Artificial Intelligence Strategy: Trustworthy, Ethical and Inclusive (Report, March 2021) <https://www.gov.scot/binaries/content/documents/govscot/publications/strategy-plan/2021/03/scotlands-ai-strategy-trustworthy-ethical-inclusive/documents/scotlands-artificial-intelligence-strategy-trustworthy-ethical-inclusive/scotlands-artificial-intelligence-strategy-trustworthy-ethical-inclusive/govscot%3Adocument/scotlands-artificial-intelligence-strategy-trustworthy-ethical-inclusive.pdf>.
-
‘OECD Updates AI Principles to Stay Abreast of Rapid Technological Developments’, OECD (Web Page, 3 May 2024)
<https://www.oecd.org/en/about/news/press-releases/2024/05/oecd-updates-ai-principles-to-stay-abreast-of-rapid-technological-developments.html>. -
Council of Europe, Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law, opened for signature 5 September 2024, CETS 225 – Artificial Intelligence, <https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence/the-framework-convention-on-artificial-intelligence>
-
UNESCO, Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (No SHS/BIO/PI/2021/1, 2022) <https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137>.
-
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (UK), A Pro-Innovation Approach to AI Regulation (Report No CP 815, March 2023).
-
Government of Canada, The Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA) – Companion Document (Web Page, 13 March 2023) <https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/innovation-better-canada/en/artificial-intelligence-and-data-act-aida-companion-document>.
-
President of the United States of America, Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence (Executive Order No 14110, 30 October 2023).
-
AI Forum New Zealand, Trustworthy AI in Aotearoa: AI Principles (Report, March 2020) <https://aiforum.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Trustworthy-AI-in-Aotearoa-March-2020.pdf>.
-
Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovations (MCTI), ‘Brazilian AI Strategy’, OECD.AI Policy Observatory (Web Page, 7 September 2022) <https://oecd.ai/en/dashboards/policy-initiatives/http:%2F%2Faipo.oecd.org%2F2021-data-policyInitiatives-27104>.
-
Bruno Bioni, Marina Garrote and Paula Guedes, Key Themes in AI Regulation: The Local, Regional and Global in the Pursuit of Regulatory Interoperability (Report, Data Privacy Brazil Research Association, 2023).
-
Cabinet Secretariat of Japan, Social Principles of Human-Centric AI (Report, Government of Japan, 2019) <https://www.cas.go.jp/jp/seisaku/jinkouchinou/pdf/humancentricai.pdf>.
-
Korea Information Society Development Institute, ‘The National Guidelines for AI Ethics’, AI Ethics Communications Channel (Web Page, 2021) <https://ai.kisdi.re.kr/eng/main/contents.do?menuNo=500011>.
-
Verify Foundation and Infocomm Media Development Authority, Model AI Governance Framework for Generative AI (Report, 30 May 2024) <https://aiverifyfoundation.sg/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Model-AI-Governance-Framework-for-Generative-AI-May-2024-1-1.pdf> Note AI Verify is a not-for profit foundation, which sits under the Infocomm Media Development Authority of Singapore. .
-
Department of Communications and Digital Technologies, South Africa National Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy Framework 2024 (Report, August 2024) <https://www.policyvault.africa/policy/south-africa-national-artificial-intelligence-ai-policy-framework-2024/>.