Artificial Intelligence in Victoria’s Courts and Tribunals: Consultation Paper

Appendix: Examples of international principles

Australia’s AI Ethics Principles[1]

• Human, societal and environmental wellbeing

• Human-centred values: respect human rights, diversity, autonomy

• Fairness: inclusive and accessible, avoid discrimination

• Privacy, protection and security

• Reliability and safety

• Transparency and explainability and responsible disclosure

• Contestability: process to challenge outcomes

• Accountability and human oversight

Ethics guidelines, European Commission[2] (referred to by EU AI Act[3])

• Human agency and oversight

• Technical robustness and safety

• Privacy and data governance

• Transparency

• Diversity, non-discrimination and fairness

• Societal and environmental well-being

• Accountability

OECD Principles on AI development[4]

• Inclusive growth, sustainable development and well-being

• Respect for rule of law, human rights and democratic values, including fairness and privacy

• Transparency and explainability

• Robustness, security and safety

• Accountability

The principles have informed other guidance e.g. Scotland’s AI Strategy.[5] Over 47 countries are adherents to the OECDS’s principles on AI.[6]

Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law[7]

• Human dignity and individual autonomy

• Transparency and oversight

• Accountability and responsibility

• Equality and non-discrimination

• Privacy and personal data protection

• Reliability

• Safe innovation, fostering innovation while avoiding adverse impacts on human rights, democracy and the rule of law.

UNESCO – recommendation on the ethics of AI[8]

• Proportionality and do no harm

• Safety and security

• Fairness and non-discrimination

• Sustainability

• Right to privacy and data protection

• Human oversight and determination

• Transparency and explainability

• Responsibility and accountability

• Awareness and literacy

• Multi-stakeholder and adaptive governance and collaboration

UK AI Framework[9]

• Safety, security and robustness

• Appropriate transparency and explainability

• Fairness

• Accountability and governance

• Contestability and redress

Cananda’s Artificial Intelligence and Data Bill[10]

• Human oversight and monitoring

• Transparency

• Fairness and equity

• Safety

• Accountability

• Validity and robustness

United States Executive Order: New Standards for AI Safety and Security[11]

• Safe and secure

• Responsible innovation, competition and collaboration

• Responsible development and commitment to support American workers

• AI policies must be consistent with advancing equity and civil rights

• Protection of user interests, including consumer protection, and safeguards against fraud, bias, discrimination, privacy

• Protection of privacy and civil liberties including secure data collection and storage

• Build government capacity to regulate, govern and support AI use

• Government should be a leader to technological progress

Trustworthy AI in Aotearoa – AI Principles[12]

• Fairness and justice

• Reliability, security and privacy

• Transparency

• Human oversight and accountability

• Wellbeing

Brazil’s National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence (EBIA)[13]

• Inclusive growth

• Sustainable development and well-being

• Human-centred values and fairness

• Transparency and explainability

• Robustness, security and safety

• Accountability.

In May 2023, the Brazilian Government introduced a Bill for a proposed regulatory approach to AI, containing the following principles:[14]

• Reliability and robustness; transparency

• Explainability, intelligibility and auditability

• Accountability, responsibility and full reparation for damage; non-maleficence (to do no harm)

• Human participation

• Non-discrimination, justice, equity and inclusion

• Inclusive growth and sustainable development

• Due process of law and contestability

• Prevention, precaution and mitigation of systemic risks.

Japan’s Social Principles of Human-Centric AI[15]

• Human-centric

• Education/literacy

• Privacy protection

• Ensuring security

• Fair competition

• Fairness, accountability, and transparency

• Innovation

These are underpinned by three core societal values:

• Dignity

• Diversity and inclusion

• Sustainability

South Korea Human Rights Guidelines on Development and Utilisation of AI[16]

Basic principles:

• Respect for human dignity

• Common good of society

• Proper use of technology

Key requirements:

• Safeguarding human rights

• Protection of privacy

• Respect for diversity

• Public good

• Solidarity

• Data management

• Accountability

• Safety

• Transparency

Singapore – AI Verify’s AI Governance and Testing Framework and Tool Kit.[17]

• Transparency

• Explainability

• Repeatability/Reproducibility

• Safety

• Security

• Robustness

• Fairness

• Data governance

• Accountability

• Human agency and oversight

• Inclusive growth, societal and environmental well-being

South Africa National AI Policy Framework[18]

Strategic pillars

• Talent development /Capacity development

• Digital infrastructure

• Research, development and innovation

• Public sector implementation

• Ethical AI guideline development

• Privacy and data protection

• Safety and security

• Transparency and explainability

• Fairness and mitigating bias


  1. Australian Government, ‘Australia’s AI Ethics Principles – Australia’s Artificial Intelligence Ethics Framework’, Department of Industry, Science and Resources (Web Page, 5 October 2022) <https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-artificial-intelligence-ethics-framework/australias-ai-ethics-principles>.

  2. High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (AI HLEG), Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI: Shaping Europe’s Digital Future (Guidelines, European Commission, 8 April 2019) 14 <https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai>.

  3. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act) [2024] OJ L 2024/1689, Recital (27).

  4. OECD, Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence (Report No OECD/LEGAL/0449, 2024).

  5. Digital Scotland, Scotland’s Artificial Intelligence Strategy: Trustworthy, Ethical and Inclusive (Report, March 2021) <https://www.gov.scot/binaries/content/documents/govscot/publications/strategy-plan/2021/03/scotlands-ai-strategy-trustworthy-ethical-inclusive/documents/scotlands-artificial-intelligence-strategy-trustworthy-ethical-inclusive/scotlands-artificial-intelligence-strategy-trustworthy-ethical-inclusive/govscot%3Adocument/scotlands-artificial-intelligence-strategy-trustworthy-ethical-inclusive.pdf>.

  6. ‘OECD Updates AI Principles to Stay Abreast of Rapid Technological Developments’, OECD (Web Page, 3 May 2024)

    <https://www.oecd.org/en/about/news/press-releases/2024/05/oecd-updates-ai-principles-to-stay-abreast-of-rapid-technological-developments.html>.

  7. Council of Europe, Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law, opened for signature 5 September 2024, CETS 225 – Artificial Intelligence, <https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence/the-framework-convention-on-artificial-intelligence>

  8. UNESCO, Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (No SHS/BIO/PI/2021/1, 2022) <https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137>.

  9. Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (UK), A Pro-Innovation Approach to AI Regulation (Report No CP 815, March 2023).

  10. Government of Canada, The Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA) – Companion Document (Web Page, 13 March 2023) <https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/innovation-better-canada/en/artificial-intelligence-and-data-act-aida-companion-document>.

  11. President of the United States of America, Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence (Executive Order No 14110, 30 October 2023).

  12. AI Forum New Zealand, Trustworthy AI in Aotearoa: AI Principles (Report, March 2020) <https://aiforum.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Trustworthy-AI-in-Aotearoa-March-2020.pdf>.

  13. Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovations (MCTI), ‘Brazilian AI Strategy’, OECD.AI Policy Observatory (Web Page, 7 September 2022) <https://oecd.ai/en/dashboards/policy-initiatives/http:%2F%2Faipo.oecd.org%2F2021-data-policyInitiatives-27104>.

  14. Bruno Bioni, Marina Garrote and Paula Guedes, Key Themes in AI Regulation: The Local, Regional and Global in the Pursuit of Regulatory Interoperability (Report, Data Privacy Brazil Research Association, 2023).

  15. Cabinet Secretariat of Japan, Social Principles of Human-Centric AI (Report, Government of Japan, 2019) <https://www.cas.go.jp/jp/seisaku/jinkouchinou/pdf/humancentricai.pdf>.

  16. Korea Information Society Development Institute, ‘The National Guidelines for AI Ethics’, AI Ethics Communications Channel (Web Page, 2021) <https://ai.kisdi.re.kr/eng/main/contents.do?menuNo=500011>.

  17. Verify Foundation and Infocomm Media Development Authority, Model AI Governance Framework for Generative AI (Report, 30 May 2024) <https://aiverifyfoundation.sg/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Model-AI-Governance-Framework-for-Generative-AI-May-2024-1-1.pdf> Note AI Verify is a not-for profit foundation, which sits under the Infocomm Media Development Authority of Singapore. .

  18. Department of Communications and Digital Technologies, South Africa National Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy Framework 2024 (Report, August 2024) <https://www.policyvault.africa/policy/south-africa-national-artificial-intelligence-ai-policy-framework-2024/>.